Considering the strict moral code that Superman has been known for, ever since these comics were out, there has been passionate discussion about the new movie ‘Man of Steel’, thank to an alternative ending.
He ends a Life. That to most Superman fans, is unthinkable despite the fact that the movie’s filmmakers have repeatedly suggested that this movie works as an origin to why he never kills again.
Despite this explanation, it’s understandable why Superman fans are upset. Of course, the simple reason being that he never kills, and in almost always, finds a solution to avoid using his superpowers in such a manner.
Considering how Superman is presented in comics, the perfect role model for kids, this movie portrays him as a flawed superhero as he utters the lines, “That’s not what I do”.
Reviewers have asked the question as to whether the ending was sheer laziness or even a bad decision. However, what is for sure is that it doesn’t really drive home the idea that Superman had no other choice but to break Zod’s neck off – and save mankind from further destruction.
With this reaction, it seems clear that apart from all the other heroes, we expect much more from Superman in upholding a moral code that demonstrates purity at all costs, even if the character is only fictional.
Yet probably the most important takeaway from this negative reaction is how Superman remains our greatest inspiration even if he has spent almost 75 years saving the world, if only figuratively